L. Tien
Ganar
P. Sekulic
Ganar
By Wojtek Kolan
En Matchstat.com te ofrecemos un análisis inigualable y detallado de las estadísticas de tenis de eventos pasados y actuales, para brindarte prognósticos de tenis precisas, consejos de apuesta, cuotas y apuestas de valor. ¡Vamos a sumergirnos en nuestro análisis de Tien vs Sekulic y descubrir quién es el favorito!
Bloomfield Hills Challenger atp
- / Quarterfinals
Learner Tien se enfrenta a Philip Sekulic en el atp Bloomfield Hills Challenger Men's Singles 2024 el . Nuestros consejos de apuestas de expertos se basan en más de 200.000 simulaciones de partidos anteriores. Cuando comience el partido tendremos resultados en vivo y estadísticas en esta página. Para ver la transmisión en vivo en los canales de televisión de este partido, consulte nuestras páginas de visualización mundial de ATP y WTA . La transmisión en vivo de prueba gratuita de Agut Vs Raonic ya está disponible aquí.
342
Ranking
342
Mejor Ranking
18
Edad
Mano
0
Total0
0
Dura0
0
Arcilla0
0
Interior0
0
Hierba0
241
Ranking
238
Mejor Ranking
20
Edad
Mano
Form
73% (63-23)
Total de Carrera V/D
56% (95-75)
88% (21-3)
YTD V/D
51% (19-18)
$0
Prize Money de Carrera
$92,390
3
YTD Títulos
0
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Te recomendamos encarecidamente que abras cuentas con al menos 3 casas de apuestas, ya que, dependiendo del partido, las cuotas pueden variar mucho entre ellas, y siempre obtener las mejores cuotas disponibles mejorará significativamente tu rentabilidad a largo plazo. ¡Te recomendamos estas casas de apuestas deportivas, así que regístrate ahora! Consulta las mejores cuotas actuales haciendo clic en los enlaces de las casas de apuestas a continuación:
GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estadísticas | Learner Tien | Philip Sekulic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 91% (21/2) | 58% (19/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 80% (43/11) | 54% (42/36) |
Games Win/Loss | 63% (309/178) | 52% (404/380) |
Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.43 |
Aces Total | 72 | 164 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.23 |
DFs Total | 51 | 89 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:28 | 1:56:19 |
Avg Opp Rank | 103.22 | 316.09 |
1st Serve % | 61% (966/1579) | 60% (1453/2407) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (669/966) | 71% (1036/1453) |
2nd Serve W% | 56% (345/613) | 51% (491/954) |
BPs Won% Total | 54% (109/203) | 40% (85/210) |
Return Pts W% | 47% (719/1526) | 38% (894/2374) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 91% (21/23) | 58% (19/33) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 47% (7/15) |
Deciding Set W% | 88% (7/8) | 67% (8/12) |
1st set W, W | 100% (18/18) | 89% (18/16) |
1st set W, L | 0% (18/0) | 11% (18/2) |
1st set L, W | 60% (5/3) | 20% (15/3) |
OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
6
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Matthew Summers
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Trevor Svajda
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Brumm
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Oliver Tarvet
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Patrick Maloney
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
2
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
8
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Noah Schachter
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Isaac Becroft
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
Ver Más
OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 3-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Philip Sekulic
Player
Emilio Nava
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hugo Dellien
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
84 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
33%
(
38 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
129)
10
Aces
27
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
28 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
43 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Philip Sekulic
Player
Robert Strombachs
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
17
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Philip Sekulic
Player
Hamish Stewart
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Philip Sekulic
Player
Remy Bertola
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
54%
(
70 of
129)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 | H2H |
Ver Más
Más fotos de tenis de Tien están disponibles aquí y fotos de Sekulic aquí.